点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
华灯辞旧岁 玉兔迎新春！“2023欢乐春节”在瑞典开启******
中新网1月17日电 1月14日，斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心张灯结彩、宾客盈门，“2023欢乐春节”活动于此拉开帷幕。中国驻瑞大使崔爱民和夫人李丽红，文化参赞兼斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心主任陈晓，瑞典莉拉音乐学院创始人妮娜·芭拉比娜(Nina Balabina)，瑞文化艺术界、教育界人士以及在瑞华侨华人约150人出席活动。
舞狮伴着喜庆的锣鼓在文化中心大门外欢迎来宾，“2023欢乐春节”活动在《欢喜迎新春 亮丽内蒙古》短片中拉开帷幕。崔爱民在致辞中指出，今年是“欢乐春节”连续20年在瑞典举办。20年来，中瑞两国人民在这里相遇相知，两国文化在这里互鉴互赏，充分体现了中瑞文化都具有强大的包容性和开放性。
图片来源：斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心崔爱民介绍，中国春节文化的本质是“天人合一”，体现了人与人、人与自然和谐相处的文化。所以，在国际交往上，中国主张世界各国应尊重文明多样性，以文明交流超越文明隔阂、文明互鉴超越文明冲突、文明共存超越文明优越，共同应对各种全球性挑战，构建人类命运共同体。
图片来源：斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心瑞典莉拉音乐学院创始人妮娜·芭拉比娜表示音乐是全人类共同的语言，它直击心灵，没有国界。多年来，莉拉音乐学院与中国驻瑞典大使馆、斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心有着传统友谊。她希望在不久的将来再次带领学生访问中国，与中国艺术家和艺术教育界人士开展广泛交流。
图片来源：斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心驻瑞典使馆文化参赞兼斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心主任陈晓在致辞中说，今天与各位嘉宾共庆第20届“欢乐春节”，是一件逢十成双的喜事，希望大家在新的一年吉祥如意。斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心成立于2016年，在过去的4年中已举办了近200场线上线下文化活动。中瑞两国文化在这里交流互鉴、美美与共。感谢各位嘉宾、各位朋友多年来对文化中心的大力支持。
图片来源：斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心随后崔爱民向莉拉音乐学院赠送了来自潍坊的串式老虎风筝。妮娜·芭拉比娜表示将把它陈列在学校博物馆，让更多的学生了解这件来自中国的艺术品。
一场融合中瑞文化元素、中西合璧的精彩文艺演出将活动推向高潮。中瑞两国艺术家的歌声或高亢嘹亮，或悠扬婉转，唱响了对春天的期盼；东西方乐器交响共鸣，饱含着对新年的美好祝福。现场嘉宾沉浸在优美的旋律中，不时报以热烈的掌声。
图片来源：斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心文艺演出后，意犹未尽的嘉宾继续观赏了《欢乐春节在内蒙》图片展。一幅幅精美的图片将人们带到地域辽阔、民风豪爽的内蒙古。这里的林海雪原让同为雪国的瑞典来宾感到亲切，而沙漠雪景、游牧渔猎、奶酒烧麦又让他们感到新奇，激发了他们极大的兴趣。
图片来源：斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心开幕式上，中国文化中心为嘉宾们准备了甘甜酥脆、满口留香的中式点心，为到场的贵宾和小朋友们赠送了欢春吉祥物小兔子，让来宾们带走了欢春T恤衫，令整场活动喜气洋洋，欢声笑语不断。
继开幕式之后，斯德哥尔摩中国文化中心将在中心各媒体平台继续推出《传承经典·新疆非遗》《中国味道 宁夏之旅》《安逸四川过大年》系列短视频、《秦时明月汉时关》丝绸之路图片展、《舞动丝路·陇上风华》云展播等精彩内容。“2023欢乐春节”活动将持续到二月五日元宵节。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)