点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
杭州西站的春运“首考”：守好回家路 暖心伴旅途******
(新春走基层)杭州西站的春运“首考”：守好回家路 暖心伴旅途
中新网杭州1月17日电(张煜欢)17日，随着D3076次列车缓缓发车，杭州西站新一天的春运工作又拉开了帷幕。去年9月才正式投入运营的杭州西站，如何应对开站以来的首次春运大考？
首场春运，讲究的是一个“暖”字。
17日上午记者来到杭州西站看到，不少书法爱好者正在候车室里为旅客现场写春联、送福字，让旅客把“福”带回家；径山茶演示吸引了不少旅客的目光，古色古香的茶道表演引得人们纷纷掏出手机拍照留念；候车室和进站口等地还设置了姜茶发放点，志愿者一杯接着一杯为旅客驱寒送暖。
杭州西站迎来大客流。 王刚 摄据了解，杭州西站今年春运预计发送旅客28万人次，日均发送旅客1.2万人次，客流高峰日为1月18日，预计发送旅客2.5万人次。
记者看到，杭州西站自助售票处共有7处，地面到达层“云谷”两侧电梯后各1处，东西进站厅各2处，候车室内综合服务中心1处，共有53台自动售票机。今日客流虽然较前几日有所提高，但现场依旧井然有序。
杭州西站值班站长吴佩佩说，站内的每个区域均可提供购票、改签、退票、打印报销凭证、打印行程信息提示等服务。
作为“轨道上的长三角”重要节点工程、服务保障杭州2022年亚运会的重要交通配套工程，今年春运期间，杭州西站提出落实防控举措、凝聚多方力量，为旅客平安出行、有序出行、温馨出行送去新春美好体验。
暖心服务，少不了“之江心驿”雷锋服务站的身影。该服务站传承“赵红卫服务网络班”优良传统，在杭州西站内推行个性服务，例如针对盲人、腿脚不便者等不同类别的重点旅客，车站提前对接掌握特殊服务需求。
志愿者为旅客送姜茶。 张煜欢 摄首场春运，讲究的还是一个“新”字。
其实自2022年9月22日正式投入运营以来，杭州西站已先后经历了国庆和元旦运输考验，凭借“创新的站场设计”“创新的技术运用”和“创新的客运供给”给旅客带来了更快速、更舒适和更周到的候乘体验。
杭州西站客运值班员王强自杭州西站开站筹备之初就坚守在这一岗位。他告诉记者，杭州西站采用“中间进站、两端候车”设计，旅客通过地铁、公交等方式进站，不再绕道到站房两端，从“云谷”乘坐扶梯能直达中部候车厅，大大提升旅客出行效率。
志愿者为旅客送姜茶。 张煜欢 摄为迎接即将到来的客流高峰，杭州西站正继续加强预想研判，提前做好风险防范。“比如我们对出发客流相对的集中的列车，会做好现场组织，重点对进站口、检票口、站台层加强引导力量，确保旅客有序进站乘车。”王强说。
记者看到，为进一步落实防控措施，候车室内还引进消杀洗地机器人。根据规划路线，机器人可在指定区域连续作业4小时，每小时可覆盖1200平方米。另外，杭州西站也“严阵以待”，加大巡防力度护平安。春运期间，铁路公安实行24小时在岗，常态执行巡逻和安检、线路巡查等工作，为每个归家路上的游子“保驾护航”。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)